Understanding Chicago's Controversial Property Tax Referendum
This episode of the Commercial Real Estate Daily podcast is brought to you by CRE Launch Pro. If you’re looking to take your investing skills to the next level with online courses, group coaching calls, and a community of other investors, head on over to www.CreLaunchPro.com
In the ongoing saga of Chicago's real estate transfer tax, a recent appellate court decision has put the Bring Chicago Home measure back on voters' ballots, sparking a new legal battle. Attorneys representing commercial real estate interests have filed an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court, aiming to invalidate the referendum before votes are cast on March 19.
Originally, BOMA Chicago successfully struck the tax measure from the ballot, but a recent appellate court ruling overturned this decision, reigniting the debate. The proposed tax would establish a tiered system, reducing taxes on property sales under $1M while increasing rates on larger sales to fund efforts to combat homelessness.
BOMA argues that the referendum's ballot language is misleading and violates municipal code and state statutes. They believe voters deserve a clear and fair legislative process, free from interference. However, supporters of the measure argue that Chicagoans should have a say in addressing the housing crisis, accusing CRE interests of attempting to stifle democracy.
With the referendum approaching, both sides are ramping up efforts to sway public opinion. The outcome could have significant implications, with nonresidential property sales expected to contribute the majority of increased tax revenue. Critics of the measure argue that the city lacks a detailed plan for utilizing funds effectively to support the homeless and ensure accountability.
As the legal battle continues, Chicagoans await the outcome of the referendum, which promises to shape the future of real estate taxation in the city.
This is Tyler Cauble, Signing off